<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for ITSinsider</title>
	<atom:link href="http://susanitsa.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://susanitsa.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>2.0 for the Enterprise</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 05:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Circles of Expertise in 2.0 for Biz by Circles of 2.0 : Socialwrite.com</title>
		<link>http://susanitsa.wordpress.com/2008/07/07/circles-of-expertise-in-20-for-biz/#comment-17342</link>
		<dc:creator>Circles of 2.0 : Socialwrite.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 17:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susanitsa.wordpress.com/?p=238#comment-17342</guid>
		<description>[...] Susan and I have been working on articulating how the different worlds of &#8220;2.0&#8243; fit toge..., or don&#8217;t, from the point of view of the enterprise. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Susan and I have been working on articulating how the different worlds of &#8220;2.0&#8243; fit toge&#8230;, or don&#8217;t, from the point of view of the enterprise. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Circles of Expertise in 2.0 for Biz by Niall Cook</title>
		<link>http://susanitsa.wordpress.com/2008/07/07/circles-of-expertise-in-20-for-biz/#comment-17341</link>
		<dc:creator>Niall Cook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 08:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susanitsa.wordpress.com/?p=238#comment-17341</guid>
		<description>Susan,

I think you should split out "Enterprise 2.0" into its internal and external components. Forrester calls these "Enterprise 2.0" and "Social Computing" respectively, and puts them both under one "Enterprise Web 2.0" heading.

Niall</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susan,</p>
<p>I think you should split out &#8220;Enterprise 2.0&#8243; into its internal and external components. Forrester calls these &#8220;Enterprise 2.0&#8243; and &#8220;Social Computing&#8221; respectively, and puts them both under one &#8220;Enterprise Web 2.0&#8243; heading.</p>
<p>Niall</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Circles of Expertise in 2.0 for Biz by Gavin Heaton</title>
		<link>http://susanitsa.wordpress.com/2008/07/07/circles-of-expertise-in-20-for-biz/#comment-17340</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Heaton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 00:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susanitsa.wordpress.com/?p=238#comment-17340</guid>
		<description>Very interesting ... do you see the "mass collaboration" circle as including "consumer participants" or would these folks create a comprise a separate circle? I would see this circle as overlapping digital marketing and social media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting &#8230; do you see the &#8220;mass collaboration&#8221; circle as including &#8220;consumer participants&#8221; or would these folks create a comprise a separate circle? I would see this circle as overlapping digital marketing and social media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Circles of Expertise in 2.0 for Biz by James Dellow</title>
		<link>http://susanitsa.wordpress.com/2008/07/07/circles-of-expertise-in-20-for-biz/#comment-17339</link>
		<dc:creator>James Dellow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 00:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susanitsa.wordpress.com/?p=238#comment-17339</guid>
		<description>Glad to see you have RSS in the Enterprise 2.0 part :-), but there are probably a few more tools that support SLATES that could be thrown in there too - e.g. search, tagging etc (which might actually overlap with mass collaboration). The other player you might like to add into the background is around information and even records management.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to see you have RSS in the Enterprise 2.0 part :-), but there are probably a few more tools that support SLATES that could be thrown in there too - e.g. search, tagging etc (which might actually overlap with mass collaboration). The other player you might like to add into the background is around information and even records management.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Circles of Expertise in 2.0 for Biz by cindystephenson</title>
		<link>http://susanitsa.wordpress.com/2008/07/07/circles-of-expertise-in-20-for-biz/#comment-17338</link>
		<dc:creator>cindystephenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 00:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susanitsa.wordpress.com/?p=238#comment-17338</guid>
		<description>Thank you - I've not seen these groupings laid out this way before, but it makes sense and is a very helpful way of depicting it. I'll be following this with interest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you - I&#8217;ve not seen these groupings laid out this way before, but it makes sense and is a very helpful way of depicting it. I&#8217;ll be following this with interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Andrew McAfee: Rebel with a Cause by Harsha</title>
		<link>http://susanitsa.wordpress.com/2008/07/02/andrew-mcafee-rebel-with-a-cause/#comment-17337</link>
		<dc:creator>Harsha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 13:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susanitsa.wordpress.com/?p=237#comment-17337</guid>
		<description>Ms Susan

i found an answer to my  mail in Andrew's blog, "The Enterprise 2.0 repository". And thanks to Socialtext for hosting the site (http://www.socialtext.net/cases2/index.cgi?) and your mail id which directed me to Ngenera.com which gave me a gr8 book "wikinomics" of Don Tapscott and Anthony D wiliams. I think all my questions have been answered in some or other way. Thanks to you, your mail and your blog but for which, this would not have been possible. bye</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ms Susan</p>
<p>i found an answer to my  mail in Andrew&#8217;s blog, &#8220;The Enterprise 2.0 repository&#8221;. And thanks to Socialtext for hosting the site (http://www.socialtext.net/cases2/index.cgi?) and your mail id which directed me to Ngenera.com which gave me a gr8 book &#8220;wikinomics&#8221; of Don Tapscott and Anthony D wiliams. I think all my questions have been answered in some or other way. Thanks to you, your mail and your blog but for which, this would not have been possible. bye</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Prepare Ye: the We Generation is Upon Us. by Does your CEO really believe &#8220;our employees are our greatest asset&#8221;? &#171; Nickpoint</title>
		<link>http://susanitsa.wordpress.com/2008/06/19/prepare-ye-the-we-generation-is-upon-us/#comment-17336</link>
		<dc:creator>Does your CEO really believe &#8220;our employees are our greatest asset&#8221;? &#171; Nickpoint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 20:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susanitsa.wordpress.com/?p=234#comment-17336</guid>
		<description>[...] your CEO really believe &#8220;our employees are our greatest&#160;asset&#8221;?  Susan Scrupski had some strong words in her post about GenY and the self-serving behaviour of management [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] your CEO really believe &#8220;our employees are our greatest&nbsp;asset&#8221;?  Susan Scrupski had some strong words in her post about GenY and the self-serving behaviour of management [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Andrew McAfee: Rebel with a Cause by Mike Chapman</title>
		<link>http://susanitsa.wordpress.com/2008/07/02/andrew-mcafee-rebel-with-a-cause/#comment-17334</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Chapman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 23:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susanitsa.wordpress.com/?p=237#comment-17334</guid>
		<description>Nice post. You've humanized Andy in five paragraphs and given a great insight into what's really happening behind the "rebellion." Of course brilliant students have been promoted by the ruling class to do their bidding throughout human history. It's very encouraging that the Andy McAfees of the world can gain the influence they deserve even without that patronage. The story of how you first became known to Andy supports that. Anyone with something to say and willing to say it can, more and more, get in on the conversation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post. You&#8217;ve humanized Andy in five paragraphs and given a great insight into what&#8217;s really happening behind the &#8220;rebellion.&#8221; Of course brilliant students have been promoted by the ruling class to do their bidding throughout human history. It&#8217;s very encouraging that the Andy McAfees of the world can gain the influence they deserve even without that patronage. The story of how you first became known to Andy supports that. Anyone with something to say and willing to say it can, more and more, get in on the conversation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Splommenters&#8211; please &#8220;no comment&#8221; by simone</title>
		<link>http://susanitsa.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/splommenters-please-no-comment/#comment-17333</link>
		<dc:creator>simone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 17:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susanitsa.wordpress.com/?p=223#comment-17333</guid>
		<description>We had exactly the same experience, at first we were happy that microsoft left a comment at www.thextweb.org and our new business magazine for female internet heroes, www.thenextwomen.com then we replied and nothing came about. we looked at linkedin etc. and now we feel a little bit strange about it. Microsoft want more women involved, we want to help them to reach these women and now they don't reply.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We had exactly the same experience, at first we were happy that microsoft left a comment at <a href="http://www.thextweb.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.thextweb.org</a> and our new business magazine for female internet heroes, <a href="http://www.thenextwomen.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.thenextwomen.com</a> then we replied and nothing came about. we looked at linkedin etc. and now we feel a little bit strange about it. Microsoft want more women involved, we want to help them to reach these women and now they don&#8217;t reply&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Prepare Ye: the We Generation is Upon Us. by Nick Barker</title>
		<link>http://susanitsa.wordpress.com/2008/06/19/prepare-ye-the-we-generation-is-upon-us/#comment-17331</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Barker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 12:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susanitsa.wordpress.com/?p=234#comment-17331</guid>
		<description>I had thought Enterprise 2.0 adoption justified on GenYers (Millennials) was being overhyped by the industry. However after hearing several of the real world case study presenters at the Boston conference and your post I'm starting to change my view.

I think Don Burke of the CIA was right when he said ‘at no other time has the rate of technological change been so rapid within a life time.’ The problem is the GenYers and the innovative Web2.0 start-ups are going so fast most enterprise hierarchies and their technology suppliers cannot currently keep-up.  By time enterprises get there the GenYers may well have moved on. The change needed is much more that just technology and a short term initiative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had thought Enterprise 2.0 adoption justified on GenYers (Millennials) was being overhyped by the industry. However after hearing several of the real world case study presenters at the Boston conference and your post I&#8217;m starting to change my view.</p>
<p>I think Don Burke of the CIA was right when he said ‘at no other time has the rate of technological change been so rapid within a life time.’ The problem is the GenYers and the innovative Web2.0 start-ups are going so fast most enterprise hierarchies and their technology suppliers cannot currently keep-up.  By time enterprises get there the GenYers may well have moved on. The change needed is much more that just technology and a short term initiative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
